En Espanol
Iris House
Get Tested Donate
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Staff
    • Heroes
    • Publications
    • Funding and Finances
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Links and Resources
    • Contact Us
  • Programs
    • Living with HIV
    • Behavioral Health Services
    • Capacity Building
    • Condoms and Outreach
    • Emotional Wellness Groups
    • Food and Nutrition
    • Home & Community Based Services
    • Housing
    • LGBT Services
    • New Jersey Programs
    • Pharmacy Services
    • PrEP 4 Life
    • Prevention Education >
      • PrEP 4 Life
    • Testing Services >
      • Mobile Testing!
    • Women's Services >
      • Love Your Life
  • Events
    • The 14th Annual Women as the Face of AIDS Summit >
      • Summit Presentations and Photos
    • 25th Anniversary
    • Community Health Fairs
    • Past Summits >
      • Presentation Archive
      • The 13th Annual Women as the Face of AIDS Summit
      • The 12th Annual Women as the Face of AIDS Summit >
        • Summit Sponsorship
  • News
    • 14th Annual Summit
    • 25 Years and Counting
    • Celebrating 25 Years
    • Reducing HIV in Women >
      • Love Your Life 2017
    • Testing Van in NJ!
    • Serving the Community
    • In The Community
    • Viral Suppression
    • VocesLatinas
  • Become a Client
  • Volunteer
  • Become a Donor
  • Job Openings
  • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • En Espanol

The Thin Line Between Anger and Advocacy

5/22/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Michael Barret Jones, 
Director of Development,
 Social Media and Advocacy
Last night I was privileged to attend a special screening of HBO’s upcoming film “The Normal Heart” in an audience filled with people working for HIV Services Organizations.  It was the perfect room in which to see this movie, because the audience itself brought with it the history reflected on the screen.

We are now 30 years past the events depicted semi-fictitiously in the film, and one of the most stirring revelations I had was this:  history has redeemed author Larry Kramer, GMHC founding president Paul Popham and GHMC founding executive director Rodger MacFarlane, who are the real life counterparts of the film’s Ned Weeks, Bruce Niles and Tommy Boatwright.  They were all right, and they were all doing what they thought they needed to in the moment.  When I first encountered the play in the late 1980’s, Bruce/Paul seemed to be the antagonist of the piece, which would always favor the author/protagonist’s point of view.  Today, however, it seems clear that even to Kramer, he understands that he was imperfect, and that Bruce/Paul was imperfect, but that they were both working on the same problem from different angles.

Kramer’s approach, and his need to keep fighting when he was forced off the board of GMHC, gave him the strength to co-found ACT UP: an organization that could serve as the angry voice of a people oppressed.  Popham’s approach required safe and secure space in which critical services could be delivered to people who were scared and dying: GMHC.  In the 1980’s, we needed both kind of organizations, and in the 2010’s, we still do.

It is the problem that still exists today:  How can you be an attack dog and channel anger and fear to get a job done when those in power require tact and diplomacy?  How do you speak out openly and honestly about your feelings without risking the delicate work at hand?   How do you yell at people for not doing enough when it threatens your ability to receive any help at all?

Marginalized populations:  LGBT persons, racial and ethnic minorities, women, people living with HIV/AIDS, these groups have never been given any of their social advances lightly by those in power, and it requires the actions of fighters, of poets, of visionary leaders working together to gain those advances step by step.

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. had it right when he said, “Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.” He understood how to channel fear and anger toward a progressive good, and he was killed for it.  But in death, his power became even stronger and continues to inspire people today.  Larry Kramer has faced decades of character assassination for the same beliefs, but it is in his life and the fact of his survival that has given him greater power and the chance to continue the fight and continue the inspiration.

July 3rd marks the 33rd Anniversary of the first article in the New York Times about (what would become known as) AIDS, and yet, in many ways, we are facing the same problems:  marginalized populations being ignored by the mainstream power structure.  In this case, I’m talking specifically about women of color.

The National HIV/AIDS Strategy (NHAS), released in 2010, defined women’s risk factors as mostly having to do with the activities of the men in their lives, and doesn’t spend much time or energy talking about women in their own right.  Consequently, many funding streams for women’s support programs have cut or been channeled toward men’s programs, consistent with aspects of the NHAS, but at odds with what we see in the community.  If the NHAS concept of Treatment as Prevention is to be taken seriously, then programs for women with HIV should be funded proportionately to the number of cases of people living with HIV.  Cut support programs for women, and an entire population is at risk for increased health problems.  Ultimately, it impacts us all, because once again, a virus doesn’t discriminate and unless we’re working to eradicate it everywhere, we won’t succeed.

People grew complacent as drug regimens turned an HIV/AIDS diagnosis from a death sentence into a “chronic, manageable condition,” and yet we need the next generation of Larry Kramers to start shouting.  We need more money, desperately, to continue programs that we know are working to keep people living with HIV/AIDS healthy.  But at the same time, it’s hard for those of us “on the inside” to shout too loudly, to risk offending those very people who are still playing politics with people’s lives.  This film gets that right: to win a war, you have to start one.  But there are different ways to fight a war and you need both brute force and intelligence.  You can’t have one without the other, and you can’t be both.

We’ve got the intelligence.  Where’s our brute force today?  The world needs Paul Pophams AND Larry Kramers, and especially an Iris de la Cruz here and there.

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    November 2019
    May 2019
    November 2018
    October 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    February 2017
    July 2016
    October 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    May 2014
    September 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    January 2013
    September 2012
    July 2012
    April 2012
    January 2012

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly